Alright lets see how smart you are

[TadMC]

Some ones high on their horse.






















Just joking

[CirclesCenter]

152. Please don't flame, I test well. 

Probably because the last time I took a test I got 147 (f**king writing part got me because I write slow! ) And this one didn't peg me for that.

[jen_]

117 with 4:08 left...  I, too, shouldn't have rushed.  I'm busy watching "HOUSE" on FOX

You all wish you were as smart and cool as House.




(no, this is not where we start the House is a squid thread)

[TadMC]

They just had the bike in popular science , so apparently the writers of the show are looking to PS for new plot twistss

[Jake D]

awww f%$k I missed house...

There's another one on right afterwards, so watch the second!

After the second episode of House it's on to L&O: SVU, then Simpsons, Letterman, and Conan.

If you were as smart as you say you are, you'd get cable.

[natedawg120]

126 with a little over 5 minutes left.  now lets all take it really plastered and see if we can all be morons

[annguyen1981]

Jen_:  I missed that episode...  Is that Cameron on the back?

[badkarma506]

100 with 6 minutes left.  they lie when they tell you that pot kills the dumb brain cells first. (currently working on a 40 and a bowl.)  btw  house sucks, tv in general sucks.  I spent last weekend out on the river enjoying life.  i don't know how you people can stand to watch that crap.

[jen_]

Jen_:  I missed that episode...  Is that Cameron on the back?

Yep, that's Cameron.  Season 2 Episode "Deception".  Foreman is "in charge" and sends House and Cam to search the patients house for clues to what causing her illness.  The patient is a chick House meets at an OTB horse racing place and is played by Cynthia Nixon from Sex and the City.  Too much information? 
House gives Cameron his helmet (open face--ick), but dosent give up his leather jacket.  But riding in jeans while there's snow on the ground? brr.

[aaronstj]

The age and whether you check english as a second language or not don't seem to matter much.  There's  a five point difference between a 1-year-old non-English speaker and a 99-year-old English speaker.

The correct answers are:

01 T
02 T
03 T
04 F
05 T
06 F
07 T
08 T
09 T
10 T
11 T
12 T
13 T
14 T
15 F
16 T
17 T
18 F
19 F
20 F
21 T
22 F
23 T
24 T
25 T
26 F
27 T
28 F
29 F
30 F
31 F
32 F
33 F
34 T
35 F
36 F
37 F
38 T

Clicking as fast as I can read them, as a 1 year old non-English speaker, I get a 156.  Getting them all wrong, a 19.

Seems kind of silly to have classifications for people above 156, since it appears to be unobtainable.

Like I said, not much faith in the test.  It's pretty easy, and I'm guessing most of us got one or two wrong (if that) just from sloppy reading.  A better test would have even geniuses getting a decent portion of the questions so it could be properly calibrated against them, as opossed to any reasonably smart person topping out the test.  Oh well, it's the intarweb, what do you want?