News:

Protect your dainty digits. Get a good pair of riding gloves cheap Right Here

Main Menu

Electric GS500

Started by scottpA_GS, May 25, 2008, 07:28:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ohgood

Quote from: manofthefield on May 27, 2008, 09:30:24 AM
IIRC, it said front sprocket was 11T :o

Wow, if that's -just- a 10 ft/lb torque motor, that thing is a freaking wheelie machine with those cogs ! Hope the variable pot is sensitive enough to NOT flip it every time you take off ! :D




tt_four: "and believe me, BMW motorcycles are 50% metal, rubber and plastic, and 50% useless

GeeP

Quote from: ohgood on May 27, 2008, 03:36:04 AM
Quote from: GeeP on May 26, 2008, 02:59:33 PM
Quote from: frankieG on May 26, 2008, 12:15:46 PMand what is it with that huge rear sprocket? 

Speed reduction.  He likely needs a decent reduction to get into the motor's sweet spot, much more important with DC motors.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't DC and AC motors create ALL of their available torque @ 1 to infinity rpms ?

If so, then the big rear sprocket is for chain wrap, and I'd bet there was a largish front sprocket also. You know, 50% wrap or whatever to keep things working well.

A 'lectric gs would rock. Light bike, good handling, good ergos for commuting, and the cost per fillup (plus assuming a replacement battery at some point worked in) of around $.30 each ?

Someday, capacitors will have a major storage / charging bump, and we'll all enjoy the smooth immediate torque of electric motors. Imagine a leasing agreement with 'gas' stations where you pull in, and swap out your battery for a charged one in 2 minutes, for $10. Awesome. Never happen in the US though, sadly :(



DC motors generate peak torque at stall, yes.  Torque falls off as speed increases, until net torque output is zero at no-load speed.  Therefore, gearing is important.  Too much of a reduction and it's a wheelie monster with little top speed.  To little reduction and it's a fast bike, but slow to get there.



AC motors are somewhat the opposite.  An AC motor generates torque as a function of rotor slip.  In other words, up to a point, the more the rotor lags behind the rotating field, the more torque is generated.  That point is called the Break Down Torque.  Increasing the load beyond that point will cause a rapid loss of rotor speed (and therefore power).

http://www.tpub.com/content/doe/h1011v4/css/h1011v4_27.htm

The interesting part about AC motors is that if you vary the frequency to the motor (thus regulating the slip) you can power a motor with a perfectly flat torque curve from nearly 0 to 120% rated output or beyond.  The surge ratings can be significantly higher.

Locomotive manufacturers have known this for years.  The best measure of locomotive traction efficiency is adhesion.  In other words, how much of the locomotive's weight is turned into tractive effort.  A 100,000 lb locomotive developing 20,000 lbs of tractive effort has a factor of adhesion of .2, or 20% of the locomotive's weight.  19% to 22% is common for DC traction.  However, a locomotive operating with AC traction motors can have factors of adhesion of up to 40%, mainly due to the increased motor control afforded by AC control.

What does that mean for motorcycles?  Imagine a bike with smooth, effortless power.  ALL of that power is available ALL the time.  In fact, the variable frequency drive will need to have a ramp time, otherwise the machine will wheelie instantly.  Traction control could be incorporated very easily with existing industrial VFDs, regulating wheel slip even during cornering.  Rear braking would be dynamic with traction control (no more locked rears, ever).

Oh, yeah.  The motor and control should outlast the frame.  Just grease the bearings every 10,000 hours of operation.  :)
Every zero you add to the tolerance adds a zero to the price.

If the product "fails" will the product liability insurance pay for the "failure" until it turns 18?

Red '96
Black MK2 SV

starwalt

Nuts. The dude beat me to it. He is running the same motor I planned to put on my conversion.

After running numbers on weight and using one of the EMoto spreadsheet out in the EV community, I decided the GS was too heavy to get any range.

Weight, wind resistance, and system friction  are the killers of EV performance. I am considering a composite GS chassis...but then it really wouldn't be a GS anymore would it?
-=Doug......   IT ≠ IQ.

God save us from LED turn signal mods!

Get an Ebay GS value  HERE.

1990 GS running, 1990 GS work-in-progress, 1990 basket case.
The trend here is entropy

scottpA_GS

Quote from: starwalt on May 28, 2008, 04:14:13 PM
Nuts. The dude beat me to it. He is running the same motor I planned to put on my conversion.

After running numbers on weight and using one of the EMoto spreadsheet out in the EV community, I decided the GS was too heavy to get any range.

Weight, wind resistance, and system friction  are the killers of EV performance. I am considering a composite GS chassis...but then it really wouldn't be a GS anymore would it?

Thats awesome... You plan on building an electric bike?  :thumb: Be sure and post your progress  :cheers:


~ 1990 GS500E Project bike ~ Frame up restoration ~ Yosh exhaust, 89 clipons, ...more to come...

~ 98 Shadow ACE 750 ~ Black Straight Pipes ~ UNI Filter ~ Dyno Jet Stage 1 ~ Sissy Bar ~


manofthefield

Quote from: starwalt on May 28, 2008, 04:14:13 PMI am considering a composite GS chassis...but then it really wouldn't be a GS anymore would it?

I think it would be if the composite chassis was molded in the shape of the GS frame :icon_mrgreen:
motorcycleless
1998 GS500E sold 6/20/11

natedawg120

Quote from: manofthefield on May 28, 2008, 05:34:15 PM
Quote from: starwalt on May 28, 2008, 04:14:13 PMI am considering a composite GS chassis...but then it really wouldn't be a GS anymore would it?

I think it would be if the composite chassis was molded in the shape of the GS frame :icon_mrgreen:

yeah thats close enough for me  :laugh:
Bikeless in RVA

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk