Economics explained using cows

[The Buddha]

congress approved iraq. making it a LEGAL war. not the illegal one in libya lol. ( wich never went before congress. yeah htey all run on what can they do to get back in. once htey become a lame duck, then were in a world of shaZam!. pray that obummer doesnt get back in. need to start fresh

Yes congress approved Iraq based on the lies told to us by Cheney. Libya has a Nato and UN resolution. Iraq did not. The Libya premise has been supported by big voices on both sides, John McCain comes to mind immediately. The Nato troops needed support, in fact we were late in providing it. It was an easy war to win if we had acted 6 weeks before we did, and tied in better via communications.
Cool.
Buddha.

[yamahonkawazuki]

not cheney. cia. or other intel agencies. no matter who sent our guys into libya it was still an act of war, and is governed by our laws, including going before congress. is it not?

[The Buddha]

Supporting role in Libya the argument goes didn't need approval. I dunno why they didn't get approval, its likely to have been approved by congress anyway cos a bunch of republicans were for it. Anyway there is only drones and equipment, no soldiers.
Cool.
Buddha.

[yamahonkawazuki]

Supporting role in Libya the argument goes didn't need approval. I dunno why they didn't get approval, its likely to have been approved by congress anyway cos a bunch of republicans were for it. Anyway there is only drones and equipment, no soldiers.
Cool.
Buddha.

wasnt a nato mission in beginning. soldiers on boat or elsewhere. they were involved. as far as i know had bush done this libya mission all hell would break loose. lol. it was turned over to nato after ops were underway

[The Buddha]

Supporting role in Libya the argument goes didn't need approval. I dunno why they didn't get approval, its likely to have been approved by congress anyway cos a bunch of republicans were for it. Anyway there is only drones and equipment, no soldiers.
Cool.
Buddha.

wasnt a nato mission in beginning. soldiers on boat or elsewhere. they were involved. as far as i know had bush done this libya mission all hell would break loose. lol. it was turned over to nato after ops were underway

Hell break loose, you mean like rush and Hannity is doing to OBama now ? Yes very unlikely, and that is after the war based on the lies ...
Cool.
Buddha.

[yamahonkawazuki]

Supporting role in Libya the argument goes didn't need approval. I dunno why they didn't get approval, its likely to have been approved by congress anyway cos a bunch of republicans were for it. Anyway there is only drones and equipment, no soldiers.
Cool.
Buddha.

wasnt a nato mission in beginning. soldiers on boat or elsewhere. they were involved. as far as i know had bush done this libya mission all hell would break loose. lol. it was turned over to nato after ops were underway

Hell break loose, you mean like rush and Hannity is doing to OBama now ? Yes very unlikely, and that is after the war based on the lies ...
Cool.
Buddha.

like obama not giving credit to bush for ending iraq via hte treaty signed in 2006? calling for withdrawal by december 2011?

[The Buddha]

I actually saw Obama's speech where he give credit to bush for getting Bin Laden, I dont recall the 2006 withdrawl treaty though.

Cool.
Buddha.

[yamahonkawazuki]

I actually saw Obama's speech where he give credit to bush for getting Bin Laden, I dont recall the 2006 withdrawl treaty though.

Cool.
Buddha.

no not binladen. thats nto at issue. the Sofa agreement was/ agreement/treaty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.%E2%80%93Iraq_Status_of_Forces_Agreement

[The Buddha]

Aaaa after lying to us and getting into an illegal war There was a SOFA that specified withdrawl by dec 2011, sorry I forgot. Yes SOFA was there to make Obama withdraw. Got it.
Cool.
Buddha.