(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h320/TadMC/img.jpg)
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h320/TadMC/01.jpg)
2006 Sentra SE-R Spec V
Your Selections
Colors
Sapphire Blue Exterior
SE-R Spec V Charcoal Interior
Transmission
6-Speed Manual
Packages and Options
MSRP
SE-R/SE-R Spec V Audio Fanatic Package $650.00
1.8 S/SE-R/SE-R Spec V Sunroof Package $700.00
Side-impact Air Bags and ABS $600.00
Accessories
Carpeted Floor Mats and Trunk Mat (with Audio Fanatic Package, Audio Package, 1.8 S Special Edition Package) $150.00
In-Cabin Microfilter $50.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Features
Mechanical
QR25DE - 2.5-liter DOHC 16-valve 4-cylinder engine
Horsepower - 175 hp @ 6,000 rpm
Torque - 180 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm
Emissions - LEV
Continuously Variable Valve Timing Control System (CVTCS)
Variable Intake System
Nissan Direct Ignition System with platinum-tipped spark plugs
Electronic drive-by-wire throttle
Engine balancer system
Free-flow exhaust
Front engine/front-wheel drive
6-speed close-ratio manual transmission
Helical limited-slip differential
17" x 7.0" 6-spoke aluminum-alloy wheels
P215/45ZR17 (Z-rated) performance tires
Front: Independent strut-type suspension
Rear: Multi-Link Beam™ suspension
Thick front and rear stabilizer bars
Spec V-rated suspension - extra-firm springs, revised shock damping and firmer front polyurethane bushings
Front strut tower brace
Engine speed-sensitive power-assisted rack-and-pinion steering
Front vented disc/rear disc brakes
Exterior
SE-R-style grille
Lower-body side sill extensions
Rear spoiler
Black headlight surround and smoked taillights
Fog lights
Chrome exhaust-tip finishers
Dual power body-color outside mirrors
Interior
Air conditioning
Trip computer with multiple displays
Power windows with driver-side one-touch auto-down feature
Power door locks
Remote keyless entry with trunk release
Cruise control
Tachometer and low washer-fluid warning light
Battery saver
Overhead sunglasses storage with map lights
Tilt steering column
Rear defroster
Variable intermittent windshield wipers
Dual visor vanity mirrors
Digital clock (in radio)
Auxiliary 12-volt DC power outlet
Rear auxiliary 12-volt DC power outlet
Rear floor heater ducts
Front cup holders
Rear cup holders
Coin box
Covered center console
Top-of-dash storage
Audio
Premium AM/FM/CD audio system
Seven speakers, including subwoofer
Auxiliary input jack
Safety and Security
Dual front supplemental air bags
3-point ALR/ELR passenger seat belt system (ELR for driver)
Front seat belts with pretensioners and load limiters
LATCH System (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren)
Child-safety rear door locks
Energy-absorbing steering column
Front and rear crumple zones
Hood buckling creases
Pipe-style steel side-door guard beams
Base MSRP† $18,300
Exterior Color
Sapphire Blue
Interior Color
Transmission
6-Speed Manual
Packages and Options
SE-R/SE-R Spec V Audio Fanatic Package $650
1.8 S/SE-R/SE-R Spec V Sunroof Package $700
Side-impact Air Bags and ABS $600
Accessories††
Carpeted Floor Mats and Trunk Mat (with Audio Fanatic Package, Audio Package, 1.8 S Special Edition Package) $150
In-Cabin Microfilter $50
Subtotal $20,450
Destination and Handling $605
Total Configured MSRP† $21,055
Estimated Monthly Payment
I know I know, "A NISSAN SENTRA", but listen. when i first started driving I had a old 90 sentra. We had a problem with the engine and so we got it overhauled and bored the cyclinders and it was so fast that my butt would bleed when I'd hit the gas
I will be getting it in about 6 weeks!!!
Decent. You've got to get the Nismo version.
I cant find any specs on the nismo version
Not bad. nice tq... could definitely use more in the hp department.
175 HP out of a 2.5? Weak.
well it is a 4 cylinder
I think I would try and get something with at least 200rwhp.
I think I would get something with at least 40 MPG... :dunno_white:
Why get a fast car when you have a bike?
$5.00 a gallon isn't that far off.
well why dont I get a Toyota Yaris and completely cut my testes offffffffffffffffffffffffff
Quote from: TadMC on May 23, 2006, 04:55:17 PM
well it is a 4 cylinder
So?
Honda S2000 - 237HP (2.2L)
Honda Civic Si - 197HP (2.0L)
Toyota Celica - 180HP (1.8L)
Lotus Elise - 190HP (1.8L)
Mazda MX-5 Miata - 170HP (2.0L)
Mazda MX-5 Mazdaspeed Miata - 178HP (1.8L)
Most of those are RWD too, rather than FWD (I hate FWD though).
They also all get pretty decent gas mileage, too.
BUT!!! I do have to say that at least nissan has its own offical aftermarket parts. I do plan to put a carbon fiber hood and put a turbo (seriously) i ownly need it to keep running for 5 years
Quote from: TadMC on May 23, 2006, 05:26:22 PMwell why dont I get a Toyota Yaris and completely cut my testes offffffffffffffffffffffffff
40 MPG is a good plan for now...
What you do with your body is up to you. ;)
Quote from: TadMC on May 23, 2006, 05:34:09 PM
BUT!!! I do have to say that at least nissan has its own offical aftermarket parts. I do plan to put a carbon fiber hood and put a turbo (seriously) i ownly need it to keep running for 5 years
Toyota has its own "aftermarket" parts. TRD. Lotus has accessory upgrades. So does Honda and Miata. They might not be "licensed aftermarket" but they are factory upgrades.
Mini Cooper S - 168HP (1.6L)
Mini Cooper S JCW - 207HP (1.6L)
Mini Cooper S JCW GP - 214HP (1.6L)
And they handle great too, from what I've read.
1
i thought this site was to whore the GS? :flipoff:
My gf just told me about this new car in japan she wants to get. the name is: i
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.co.jp/i/index.html
I'm thinking I might not fit all the way :dunno_white:
Quote from: AlphaFire X5 on May 23, 2006, 05:28:32 PM
Quote from: TadMC on May 23, 2006, 04:55:17 PM
well it is a 4 cylinder
So?
Honda S2000 - 237HP (2.2L)
Honda Civic Si - 197HP (2.0L)
Toyota Celica - 180HP (1.8L)
Lotus Elise - 190HP (1.8L)
Mazda MX-5 Miata - 170HP (2.0L)
Mazda MX-5 Mazdaspeed Miata - 178HP (1.8L)
Most of those are RWD too, rather than FWD (I hate FWD though).
They also all get pretty decent gas mileage, too.
A touch over 200
WHP in my 1.6 and a nice amount of tq.
(Turbo CRX)
Boost: Replacement for Displacement
If only cars put out as much power per cc as bikes did!!
Quote from: CRXDrew on May 23, 2006, 08:12:05 PM
Quote from: AlphaFire X5 on May 23, 2006, 05:28:32 PM
Quote from: TadMC on May 23, 2006, 04:55:17 PM
well it is a 4 cylinder
So?
Honda S2000 - 237HP (2.2L)
Honda Civic Si - 197HP (2.0L)
Toyota Celica - 180HP (1.8L)
Lotus Elise - 190HP (1.8L)
Mazda MX-5 Miata - 170HP (2.0L)
Mazda MX-5 Mazdaspeed Miata - 178HP (1.8L)
Most of those are RWD too, rather than FWD (I hate FWD though).
They also all get pretty decent gas mileage, too.
A touch over 200 WHP in my 1.6 and a nice amount of tq.
(Turbo CRX)
Boost: Replacement for Displacement
Yeah. I tried listing (mostly) naturally aspirated cars to show that decent power out of a small engine is entirely possible. I think the Honda S2000 got a world record for getting the most power per liter in a production car.
However, the most powerful (per liter) naturally aspirated engine was a Honda race engine a few years back, IIRC. Something like 1000HP out of a 1.3L engine. Freakin' insane.
Yea Honda definitely owns when it comes to low displacement high revving hp makers. 100 hp to the liter is definitely one of their greatest achievements.
Sure those 1000hp 1.3's were NA? I recall a race series where they had 1.3's and i believe 1.4's that were running some ridiculous boost level. They were shy of 1000 hp but they were still pushing more than 30lbs of boost.
Quote from: CRXDrew on May 23, 2006, 08:38:55 PM
Yea Honda definitely owns when it comes to low displacement high revving hp makers. 100 hp to the liter is definitely one of their greatest achievements.
Sure those 1000hp 1.3's were NA? I recall a race series where they had 1.3's and i believe 1.4's that were running some ridiculous boost level. They were shy of 1000 hp but they were still pushing more than 30lbs of boost.
I dunno. I heard it from my thermodynamics professor. His concentration is internal combustion engines and he's crazy about cars.
Quote from: porsche4786 on May 23, 2006, 05:09:55 PM
I think I would try and get something with at least 200rwhp.
wont get anywhere near that on that car it is fwd isnt it?
Quote from: Matty B 500 on May 23, 2006, 06:31:36 PM
i thought this site was to whore the GS? :flipoff:
and japanese cars too lol :laugh:
Quote from: yamahonkawazuki on May 23, 2006, 08:53:57 PM
Quote from: porsche4786 on May 23, 2006, 05:09:55 PM
I think I would try and get something with at least 200rwhp.
wont get anywhere near that on that car it is fwd isnt it?
Nissan Altima - 260HP (3.5L V6)
Mini Cooper S JCW (and JCW GP) - (208HP and 214HP, 1.8L I4)
Doesn't matter the drive wheels, really. Most people don't put that much power in a FWD car because of torque steer though.
i know man, i was playin "grammar nazi" said rwhp which i took as to Rear wheel horsepower. now yall got these hp numbers, but what about torque. hp is about useless without it
tq is definitely fun.... but coming from the honda world where tq is hard to come by I can definitely say its not absolutely necessary to have fun.
I'm so sorry that's your realistic dream car. Don't they have BMW's in your area?
Quote from: CRXDrew on May 23, 2006, 10:28:03 PM
tq is definitely fun.... but coming from the honda world where tq is hard to come by I can definitely say its not absolutely necessary to have fun.
H22a1 is pretty torquey. :thumb:
my realistic dream car
Clicky (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1979-Ferrari-308-GTS-A-C-4-Webers-Serviced-Excellent_W0QQitemZ4641606330QQcategoryZ6212QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)
Quote from: dwn4whadever on May 23, 2006, 10:38:09 PM
Quote from: CRXDrew on May 23, 2006, 10:28:03 PM
tq is definitely fun.... but coming from the honda world where tq is hard to come by I can definitely say its not absolutely necessary to have fun.
H22a1 is pretty torquey. :thumb:
esspecially w/ boost....
Now you have a hint into the future of my car... gimme by the end of next summer ;)
Quote from: CRXDrew on May 23, 2006, 11:18:29 PM
Quote from: dwn4whadever on May 23, 2006, 10:38:09 PM
Quote from: CRXDrew on May 23, 2006, 10:28:03 PM
tq is definitely fun.... but coming from the honda world where tq is hard to come by I can definitely say its not absolutely necessary to have fun.
H22a1 is pretty torquey. :thumb:
esspecially w/ boost....
Now you have a hint into the future of my car... gimme by the end of next summer ;)
You can have mine. Im selling my car. I gotta 93 accord with an H22a1 in it.
(http://images1.snapfish.com/346%3B68999%7Ffp58%3Dot%3E232%3B%3D399%3D%3C7%3B%3DXROQDF%3E23234%3C53%3B7296ot1lsi)
No bling bling under there, but she gets the job done. :o
ooo... nice. Not really taking advantage of it in that particular car but nice anyway. I'm gonna need some creative shoe horning and welding to get it into the CRX
This was my dream car... now its my daily beater :laugh:
http://gstwins.com/gsboard/index.php?topic=25939.0
(http://images1.snapfish.com/346%3B68999%7Ffp58%3Dot%3E232%3B%3D399%3D%3C7%3B%3DXROQDF%3E23234%3C2447879ot1lsi)
(http://images1.snapfish.com/346%3B68999%7Ffp54%3Dot%3E232%3B%3D399%3D%3C7%3B%3DXROQDF%3E23234%3C24478%3A2ot1lsi)
(http://i2.ebayimg.com/03/i/06/6f/de/65_12.JPG)
That was my dream car with a fat ass turbo in it. Now all i dream about is honda mini vans and changing diapers. 3 cars 1 bike and twins on the way. We dream died and gave birth to another. Literally. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
The Hatch is my gas saver, i call her the egg.
I tried to sell it on ebay and the guy that won the car could not come up with the deposit money. What an ass plug he was.
Quote from: AlphaFire X5 on May 23, 2006, 05:28:32 PM
Quote from: TadMC on May 23, 2006, 04:55:17 PM
well it is a 4 cylinder
So?
Honda S2000 - 237HP (2.2L)
Honda Civic Si - 197HP (2.0L)
Toyota Celica - 180HP (1.8L)
Lotus Elise - 190HP (1.8L)
Mazda MX-5 Miata - 170HP (2.0L)
Mazda MX-5 Mazdaspeed Miata - 178HP (1.8L)
Most of those are RWD too, rather than FWD (I hate FWD though).
They also all get pretty decent gas mileage, too.
Actually, I hate to screw up your research here, but the Lotus Elise uses the Toyota engine fromt he Celica, so it should have the same hp.
my realistic (someday) dream car:
(http://www.racingdynamics.com/Images/E46_M3/E46-M3-Front-700.jpg)
E46 M3 :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: I would toss the aftermarket rims in favor of some authentic BMW alloys though.
-M
Quote from: Jake D on May 24, 2006, 07:29:27 AM
Actually, I hate to screw up your research here, but the Lotus Elise uses the Toyota engine fromt he Celica, so it should have the same hp.
You're right. It does use the Toyota Celica engine. However, you're wrong in stating that it makes the same power. Lotus massaged the engine a bit to bring the power up to 190HP.
http://www.lotuscars.com/
Go look at the spec sheet for the Elise.
190 HP @ 7800 RPM
138 lb-ft @ 6800 RPM
Quote from: AlphaFire X5 on May 24, 2006, 08:42:18 AM
Quote from: Jake D on May 24, 2006, 07:29:27 AM
Actually, I hate to screw up your research here, but the Lotus Elise uses the Toyota engine fromt he Celica, so it should have the same hp.
You're right. It does use the Toyota Celica engine. However, you're wrong in stating that it makes the same power. Lotus massaged the engine a bit to bring the power up to 190HP.
http://www.lotuscars.com/
Go look at the spec sheet for the Elise.
190 HP @ 7800 RPM
138 lb-ft @ 6800 RPM
and they weigh under 2000lbs....but I'm not so sure I would want one for a daily driver. You would look like a fool getting in and out of it with the top on.
Quote from: Mandres on May 24, 2006, 07:52:35 AM
my realistic (someday) dream car:
(http://www.racingdynamics.com/Images/E46_M3/E46-M3-Front-700.jpg)
E46 M3 :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: I would toss the aftermarket rims in favor of some authentic BMW alloys though.
-M
Bout time someone has sense worth a damn...
Quote from: makenzie71 on May 24, 2006, 08:44:04 PM
Quote from: Mandres on May 24, 2006, 07:52:35 AM
my realistic (someday) dream car:
(http://www.racingdynamics.com/Images/E46_M3/E46-M3-Front-700.jpg)
E46 M3 :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: I would toss the aftermarket rims in favor of some authentic BMW alloys though.
-M
Bout time someone has sense worth a damn...
that BMW sucks!! How about this car
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h320/TadMC/yugo_rear.jpg)
im a rwd person i like celicas but they like many others are fwd as well :mad: http://www.automotive.com/2005/12/toyota/celica/specifications/index.html :dunno_white:
im a displacement person. a large engine doesnt need to work nearly as hard. however mileage suffers. suffers in small displacement engines working hard also. hmm imagine taking a larger displacement engine doing the turbo/supercharger thing to it along with the exhaust thing would be evil :icon_twisted:
what is an h22a1? :dunno_white:
Quote from: yamahonkawazuki on May 25, 2006, 12:45:44 AM
what is an h22a1? :dunno_white:
Google that shaZam!. :flipoff:
Here's 2 cars with just 4 cylinders:
(http://www.edmunds.com/media/2003/tokyo/mitsu.evovii_mr/mitsu.lancer.evo_MR.f34.500.jpg)
(http://www.allcarwallpapers.com/wallpapers/previews/subaru-impreza-wrx-sti-101.jpg)
Turbo does magical things-
Another 4 Cylinder Turbo that is my dream car:
(http://www.weblogsinc.com/common/images/3104557355612980.JPG?0.9754638449293178)
http://www.gglotus.org/ggtech/elise-forcedfed/forcedfed.htm
I am buying a (non-STI) WRX next month. Blue with 17's. Should be pretty fun. I've wanted one forever.
Yeah WRX's are fun as hell but I hate their tranny's. It's just weak and feels too loose. I'm sure the STI's tranny's are a heck of a lot better, but the non-STI are just weak. But they are easy to make it go faster than a STI. My friends got 252 awhp. That's with about I wanna say a little less than 4 grand in mods. It's wicked fast. Have fun Jake
Quote from: BOSS500 on May 25, 2006, 11:32:20 AM
Yeah WRX's are fun as hell but I hate their tranny's. It's just weak and feels too loose. I'm sure the STI's tranny's are a heck of a lot better, but the non-STI are just weak. But they are easy to make it go faster than a STI. My friends got 252 awhp. That's with about I wanna say a little less than 4 grand in mods. It's wicked fast. Have fun Jake
STis have around 300 HP, plus they look better.
Dammit Jake D, get the STi!
I would take the evo over the sti anyday, then immediately tint those clear taillights!
Forcedfed....I think they had a car in the car and dirver or road and track magazine a while back...lotus elise with 500hp.... :cry: I WANT ONE!
Quote from: CasiCUA on May 25, 2006, 10:21:26 AM
Here's 2 cars with just 4 cylinders:
(http://www.edmunds.com/media/2003/tokyo/mitsu.evovii_mr/mitsu.lancer.evo_MR.f34.500.jpg)
(http://www.allcarwallpapers.com/wallpapers/previews/subaru-impreza-wrx-sti-101.jpg)
Turbo does magical things-
Another 4 Cylinder Turbo that is my dream car:
(http://www.weblogsinc.com/common/images/3104557355612980.JPG?0.9754638449293178)
http://www.gglotus.org/ggtech/elise-forcedfed/forcedfed.htm
$300 a month car payment is okay. $500 a month car payment, not okay.
I may try and score some of the wheels of an STi though, some take off golds BBS's so I can be big pimpin' too.
Quote from: AlphaFire X5 on May 25, 2006, 12:17:31 PM
Quote from: BOSS500 on May 25, 2006, 11:32:20 AM
Yeah WRX's are fun as hell but I hate their tranny's. It's just weak and feels too loose. I'm sure the STI's tranny's are a heck of a lot better, but the non-STI are just weak. But they are easy to make it go faster than a STI. My friends got 252 awhp. That's with about I wanna say a little less than 4 grand in mods. It's wicked fast. Have fun Jake
STis have around 300 HP, plus they look better.
Dammit Jake D, get the STi!
Yeah 300 HP to the crank but loses more power to the wheels because of the AWD. So only seen STI's with a 240-245 Dyno MAX stock. Plus my friend got it for $25K OTD. STI's are 32K starting. So for $28,500 total spent my friend is faster than the STI.
4 and a half seconds, zero to 60. With a factory warranty.
Yeah, the STi sucks (same for the Evo). When your buddy's WRX takes a dump, who is going to pay to fix it with it's voided warranty?
He would have to pay for it anyway cause his warranties are over anyway. So what's your point. He wasn't going to kill his car right off the bat he waited til the warranties are done of course.
To bad factory warranties don't last forever.
We may or may not have shot a production Evo X here and I may or may not have driven it, but if I did, I would say something like "This is really going to be something special." ;) God I love my job. :thumb:
Quote from: natedawg120 on May 25, 2006, 07:35:24 AM
Quote from: yamahonkawazuki on May 25, 2006, 12:45:44 AM
what is an h22a1? :dunno_white:
engine model number.
eh would be alot easier to state engine as it is. i see these designations confuzzles the hell outta me i laugh sometimes when i see jdm this or jdm that. half the vehicles i had seen were never in the japanese market anyway. plus alot of these cars are referred to as imports. when truthfully many of them are made here :laugh: :flipoff:
This thread makes me laugh.
http://www.thhe.dk/biler/BMW_M3_CSL-01_1600.jpg
Eh, the BMW M3 CLS is better :)
(http://fastcoolcars.com/images/wallpaper18/bmw_m3_cls1.jpg)
yay that's three that don't have their head up their asses...
Quote from: makenzie71 on May 26, 2006, 12:58:00 AM
yay that's three that don't have their head up their asses...
I like that the new 3-series have availible AWD. That's pretty awesome, needless to say.
I'm also a big fan of the Z4. If only reliability were a bit higher I'd consider it over the S2000 (if I had money, of course).
The 3-series has had AWD varients for quite some time. I've never had an issue with reliabillity. My 93 325iS had 254,000 miles with only an updated waterpump housing and normal maintanance. My current 328i has 170,000 miles and has only fallen victem to a coolant leak I can't find (sucks air in) and my a/c fan is acting screwy right now.
Out of the many cars I've owned, my 3-series bimmers are the only ones to be able to hang with my old-school supras' reliabillity.
Quote from: BOSS500 on May 25, 2006, 03:33:48 PM
He would have to pay for it anyway cause his warranties are over anyway. So what's your point. He wasn't going to kill his car right off the bat he waited til the warranties are done of course.
So sorry. I though you said it would be better to get a WRX and put $4000 in bolt on parts on it than get an STi (you did). I guess you meant to say if you have a WRX with 60,000 miles on it, it is better to bolt parts on it than buy and STi.
My point is, buying an STi is better because you get one of the hottest cars on the market with a warranty. Plus, have you ever seen a tuner car for sale on e-bay. It reads like this, "Tons of mods, over 500 rear wheel hp. I have $10,000 invested in the motor alone. It can all be yours for about $5,000 under blue book value."
Once you start dorking with a car, you pretty much should just run it into the ground 'cause your re-sale is shite after that. Same with bikes. Any bike with a Power Commander III and Yosh slip on should be avoided on the re-sale market.
I agree with this. I wouldn't buy anything very heavily modded. You never know what they really did to it. Just like my rx-7, it's a nice car, and I know that all the work on it is perfect, but the next guy wouldn't have a clue how things were done. But I plan on keeping this car till I die so doesn't really matter.
Quote from: Jake D on May 26, 2006, 08:59:28 AM
Quote from: BOSS500 on May 25, 2006, 03:33:48 PM
He would have to pay for it anyway cause his warranties are over anyway. So what's your point. He wasn't going to kill his car right off the bat he waited til the warranties are done of course.
So sorry. I though you said it would be better to get a WRX and put $4000 in bolt on parts on it than get an STi (you did). I guess you meant to say if you have a WRX with 60,000 miles on it, it is better to bolt parts on it than buy and STi.
My point is, buying an STi is better because you get one of the hottest cars on the market with a warranty. Plus, have you ever seen a tuner car for sale on e-bay. It reads like this, "Tons of mods, over 500 rear wheel hp. I have $10,000 invested in the motor alone. It can all be yours for about $5,000 under blue book value."
Once you start dorking with a car, you pretty much should just run it into the ground 'cause your re-sale is shite after that. Same with bikes. Any bike with a Power Commander III and Yosh slip on should be avoided on the re-sale market.
Just wondering but it's a subaru. . . .how much of a resale value can it have? What Boss500 was trying to say is that his friend bought an WRX put 4K into it and was faster and cheaper than buying a base price STi. His friend started the work at about 40K, Subaru warranty is 3 years 36K miles, and now has 55K on the clock.
IF you're the type that wants to mod your car then it would make sense to get the WRX if your not the type that wants to mod the car then get the STi.
Everybody knows there are two types of people. . those that like and want to mod their ride and those that want to leave it stock. And yes modding ones car or bike does lower the resale value. But everybody already knows that just like we know that a warranty does not last forever.
To each his own.
Subaru's have excellent re-sale value, so your post means nothing to me!
Bumblee Bee tuna! Bumble Bee tuna!
Last word. Infinity!
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Btw who in their right mind would wan't to buy turbo'd sports car used. You know the damn thing was probably doged to death and on it's last leg. It's just about as bad as buying a tuner car. . . .you never know how it was driven.
For my affordable dream car a Porsche Cayman S
No more post from me on this topic
except that Sub's do not have a excellent resale value, honda, bmw, toyota, those companies have excellent resale value
Ok now you can have the last word :icon_mrgreen:
Nope. Subi's have excellent re-sale. It is clear to all that you have little to no knowledge.
I'm droppin' science like Galeleo dropped an orange!
Oh I forgot something, then really no more
04 STi in excellent condition with 35K lost 12K off the sticker price. . . . . thats in less than 2 years. . unless the car was bought within the 1st 6 months. Not sure but that doest sound to excellent to me. info from kellybluebook w/ kellybluebook averages. and that was in excellent condition got worse when you looked at good and fair.
Yeah, but in 5 years it will still be at $20k.
And since this is the last word, at least that I'll read, because I'm going on vacation, I feel pretty good about our little talk.
I'm out! The Hova has left the building!
Have a good vacation! :thumb:
Was nice being able to discuss differences in oppion without getting into name calling.