GStwin.com GS500 Message Forum

Main Area => General GS500 Discussion => Topic started by: ashman on February 26, 2007, 02:28:16 PM

Title: which is more aggressive?
Post by: ashman on February 26, 2007, 02:28:16 PM
the riding position of SV650 naked or GS500? I assume SV, anyone have some long term saddle time they can comment on?

-Ash
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: RVertigo on February 26, 2007, 03:16:38 PM
I think the SV is more, but not much more...

I know the SVS is more (Clip-ons)...  Enough to hurt my back.   :icon_confused:
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: makenzie71 on February 26, 2007, 08:07:06 PM
^says it.  SV is about the same as the GS + legroom.  The SVS has higher rearests, iirc, and lower bars so it is a lot more aggressive in posture.  I actually prefer the S.
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: SmartDrug on February 26, 2007, 11:22:39 PM
I tend to agree with Mak on the comfort.  When I first rode a bike with clipons, it really hurt my lower back and wrists, but after a week or daily riding (an hour a day), I was used to it and wouldn't go back unless it were on a streetfighter or motard.  The SV is comparable to the GS in position, but the SVS feels more attached to you.
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: Alphamazing on February 27, 2007, 12:32:39 AM
Quote from: SmartDrug on February 26, 2007, 11:22:39 PM
I tend to agree with Mak on the comfort.  When I first rode a bike with clipons, it really hurt my lower back and wrists, but after a week or daily riding (an hour a day), I was used to it and wouldn't go back unless it were on a streetfighter or motard.  The SV is comparable to the GS in position, but the SVS feels more attached to you.

And once you go motard, it's hard to go back to a sportbike. They just feel so cramped. Motards have you nice and upright and your legs have tons of room. After getting used to the motard, hopping on the GS felt awkward and scrunched.
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: makenzie71 on February 27, 2007, 12:37:44 AM
I beg to differ.  Ridden and owned all varieties of machines and I simply can not find "everything" in just one.  Motards seem cramped in comparison to an Electraglide.
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: SmartDrug on February 27, 2007, 02:49:53 AM
Quote from: AlphaFire X5 on February 27, 2007, 12:32:39 AM
Quote from: SmartDrug on February 26, 2007, 11:22:39 PM
I tend to agree with Mak on the comfort.  When I first rode a bike with clipons, it really hurt my lower back and wrists, but after a week or daily riding (an hour a day), I was used to it and wouldn't go back unless it were on a streetfighter or motard.  The SV is comparable to the GS in position, but the SVS feels more attached to you.

And once you go motard, it's hard to go back to a sportbike. They just feel so cramped. Motards have you nice and upright and your legs have tons of room. After getting used to the motard, hopping on the GS felt awkward and scrunched.

Yeah, but there's an upside and downside to everything.  Yeah motards are great city bikes, but with no wind protection, highway time sucks, even in short stints.  Also try hitting a 110mph sweeper with a 50hp bike and you'll understand why people buy high powered sportbikes.  Then again, you do have bikes like the Speed Triple, FZ1, SV1000, Z1000, and 919 that make it hard to buy anything else unless you spend a lot of time at the track.
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: makenzie71 on February 27, 2007, 02:52:18 AM
~edit~

Had a comment but realized it was based entirely on my need to argue with everything everyone says today...so you're all wrong I win na na na na na na na
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: Wrecent_Wryder on February 27, 2007, 04:03:31 AM
[5
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: natedawg120 on February 27, 2007, 08:27:47 AM
Quote from: makenzie71 on February 27, 2007, 02:52:18 AM
~edit~

Had a comment but realized it was based entirely on my need to argue with everything everyone says today...so you're all wrong I win na na na na na na na

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: Oni on February 27, 2007, 11:18:46 AM
Quote from: Wrecent_Wryder on February 27, 2007, 04:03:31 AM
Quote from: makenzie71 on February 26, 2007, 08:07:06 PM
The SVS has higher rearests, iirc, and lower bars so it is a lot more aggressive in posture.

Y'know, I've read that the rearsets are higher/further back on forums and on review websites, but I checked them out right next to each other, twice, at motorcycle shows, and I sure couldn't see any difference at all. They looked identical. I strongly suspect the ONLY difference is the clip-ons.


As far as I know, 2nd gen ('03-'07) SV's have the same peg position.  1st gen SV's ('99-'02) have a noticeable difference.  The SVS is a more aggressive posture that takes a little getting used to.  Feels like you're atop the bike vs. down in the bike with the stock GS.

Title: Re: which is more aggressive?
Post by: afi1 on April 01, 2007, 08:18:23 PM
it hurts my back!  I think i smell somthing, sniff, sniff.  I rode 200 miles on my Gixxer yesterday.  Suck it up and ride on.