I've read a bunch of stuff on the forum about people wanting the SV.
I'd have to agree that it is a great bike and it may be my next step.
But, what about the Katana? I don't hear too much about that.
Is it just old technology? Overpriced or what?
How does the Katana compare to the SV performance wise and "enjoyment" wise?
R
New Katana's (98+) at Butt Fugly! 97's are nicer looking but they are still a heavy bike.
Oh and if I remember right the Katana has the same front and rear wheels as the GS so tire choices still suck!
I dont know really, I guess I like the looks of the Sv better and I think it is easier on the pocket book. Quite a few more modes too.
kat's aren't a bad second bike either but they're more geared for touring where the SV is more a "fun in the twisties" bike. The Kat is heavy, most think its ugly (including me) making the SV a better bang for your buck. There are lots of other bikes besides these two but Suzuki has really hit on something with the SV making a great, fun all around bike for both novices and experienced riders.
Pantablo I agree,
The Kat is ugly!
The SV has everything that the GS500 has and some more "go fast" and cometic upgrades...
my money is on the SV
Stay Safe :thumb:
I second that.
Just way too heavy.
But....I'll take an earlier Katana. Say....87-94?? IMO a much prettier lookin bike.
The Katana gets bashed too much. As stated earlier, it's not a bad sport-touring bike.
The SV is MUCH lighter, and is a very modern design. The engine and components in the Katana are old-tech. That said, the weight and shape of the Katana make it better for highway riding IMHO. It has more top-end power because of the I4 engine and the fairing protects you from the elements. The stock seat is very comfy and the riding position isn't too aggressive.
I own a SV because my riding consists of mainly short-distance back-road riding. I've considered getting a used Katana for taking longer trips. It's a solid platform, and would be less buzzy on the highway for extended 80-90mph riding.
I am sure the Kat is a fine bike but we are naked bike people. At least those who chose there GS not because it makes a good first bike.
Myfriend has Katana 600 2000y.m
I ride this bike 2-3 times a week.
GS is more interesting......
Cause of weight,ugly front blinkers,start speed,ugly fairings.....
Do not like design.
But this bike is good for trip^s.
You do not get tidy .
Also the engine is good.but not enougf HP
Those Cans O Tuna are a'ight....but what's with the oven knob for a petcock? I'd try to switch from ON to RES and end up turning it to BROIL....what were they thinkin'?
I'd have to agree with the comment about the fuel switch knob.
It makes the bike look stupid, IMO.
Must be made for someone wearing 3 layers of gloves.
Compared to the goggle-eyed, tupperware bodywork, a dorky fuel switch is the least of its sins.
;)
It still amazes me that Suzuki still sells Kan-o-tunas.
You can get a Bandit 600 cheaper, and a year old YZF600R or F4 for the same price and have MUCH better bike.
I think the FZ6 and GS500F will put the last nail in the coffin of at least this iteration of the Kat (hope hope hope).