I would like to switch to the lunchbox. Why would it possibly be a bad idea?
because you'll need to do an exhaust and rejet, so more money. Other than that I love mine....
it isn't. Were you hoping we would talk you out of it?
Ok, it's $35, plus about that again for the jets. A few hours of your time, all for ~2 HP. And you might screw up a perfectly good running bike if you do it wrong.
Quote from: ecpreston on June 30, 2009, 10:15:44 PM
it isn't. Were you hoping we would talk you out of it?
Ok, it's $35, plus about that again for the jets. A few hours of your time, all for ~2 HP. And you might screw up a perfectly good running bike if you do it wrong.
bingo !
the lunchbox is good for almost free filter changes (just cleaning it) and a more open sound.
power - nah.
looks ? nah.
geek factor - nah.
coolness - well, you get stickers. :)
Lunchbox is dirty and can wear out the motor sooner.
The K&N in airbox could be almost as bad. Clean and oiled foam catches more crap than anythign in the world. I'd do UNI for longevity.
Cool.
Buddha.
Be prepared for overly load annoying sound when touring if you get a lunchbox.
Be prepared for overly load awesome sound when cruising the suburbs if you get a lunchbox.
Quote from: galahs on July 04, 2009, 12:16:11 AM
Be prepared for overly load annoying sound when touring if you get a lunchbox.
Be prepared for overly load awesome sound when cruising the suburbs if you get a lunchbox.
Load = loud.
Cool.
Buddha.
Sucks H2o also
Quote from: The Buddha on July 04, 2009, 04:05:36 PM
Quote from: galahs on July 04, 2009, 12:16:11 AM
Be prepared for overly load annoying sound when touring if you get a lunchbox.
Be prepared for overly load awesome sound when cruising the suburbs if you get a lunchbox.
Load = loud.
Cool.
Buddha.
Speling waz neva mi strong poynt
As for sucking up water, I've never had a problem with mine. It is well shielded by the frame and tank. And I have ridden in torrential rain in North Queensland's tropics for hours on end with no problems.