GStwin.com GS500 Message Forum

Main Area => Odds n Ends => Topic started by: ojstinson on August 14, 2011, 09:47:35 AM

Title: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: ojstinson on August 14, 2011, 09:47:35 AM


http://www.txchnologist.com/volumes/electric-vehicles-3/the-take-who-holds-back-the-electric-motorcycle
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: gs500e on August 14, 2011, 10:39:16 AM
I don't think it is ugly.
But i don't understand the temptation to put a 'gas' tank on the top of it (is that a hard case tank bag?).

At $43,000.... not a chance -- but that is what rich eccentric people are for.

If the Zero or Brammo were about $4,000 i would consider buying one (I am cheap, $9k is probably a fair-ish price considering).
(i have to admit that it's range would be okay for 90% of my rides.  (Well, the sora brammo would cover 99%[need another 20 miles to get to the ocean] of my range needs at 100 miles, with an over night charge to return home.)
The brammo is same weight as a GS, and is almost as fast for top speed (faster than i have been on my GS), and i would guess it comes off the line with a vengeance. 

:thumb:
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: ojstinson on August 14, 2011, 11:15:01 AM
Just wait, if you look back at trends, especially in electric things, you'll see that when the novelty wears off and they start producing more, the price comes way down----example, when basic calculators first came out they were selling for $175.oo, ( now $20.00 for a deluxe, does everything but fix your lunch ) VCRs were $1,500. ( now, if you can still find one--40 bucks )

I still say it's ugly.
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: PachmanP on August 14, 2011, 06:31:32 PM
I like the brammos and the zeros, but I'd really want more than 50-100 miles.
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: Toogoofy317 on August 16, 2011, 04:37:56 PM
Quote from: ojstinson on August 14, 2011, 11:15:01 AM
Just wait, if you look back at trends, especially in electric things, you'll see that when the novelty wears off and they start producing more, the price comes way down----example, when basic calculators first came out they were selling for $175.oo, ( now $20.00 for a deluxe, does everything but fix your lunch ) VCRs were $1,500. ( now, if you can still find one--40 bucks )



Gee I wish. My Ti-83 was $85! And I still have issues figuring out all of the STATS krap!

Mary
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: ojstinson on August 16, 2011, 06:16:16 PM
When they first came out all they did was add, subtract, multiply, and divide----I think you can pick one of those up now for $3.00. Digital watches were around $350.00 back in the 70s, now you can get a bushel of comparable Walmart Digitals for that price.



Note; I have been known to exaggerate for effect.
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: yamahonkawazuki on August 17, 2011, 04:46:01 PM
Quote from: Toogoofy317 on August 16, 2011, 04:37:56 PM
Quote from: ojstinson on August 14, 2011, 11:15:01 AM
Just wait, if you look back at trends, especially in electric things, you'll see that when the novelty wears off and they start producing more, the price comes way down----example, when basic calculators first came out they were selling for $175.oo, ( now $20.00 for a deluxe, does everything but fix your lunch ) VCRs were $1,500. ( now, if you can still find one--40 bucks )



Gee I wish. My Ti-83 was $85! And I still have issues figuring out all of the STATS krap!

Mary
love programming mine in basic to say nothgn but "f%$k you. " and repeat to infinity. takes all of 4 minutes lol
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: bill14224 on August 25, 2011, 06:14:37 PM
Quote from: ojstinson on August 16, 2011, 06:16:16 PM
When they first came out all they did was add, subtract, multiply, and divide----I think you can pick one of those up now for $3.00. Digital watches were around $350.00 back in the 70s, now you can get a bushel of comparable Walmart Digitals for that price.

Note; I have been known to exaggerate for effect.

That's not much of an exaggeration!  As for the electric bikes we see in that link they're not all ugly I think, especially if you like bikes like the B-King.  I don't think electric bikes will ever become popular because they're too quiet.  Quiet bikes add more danger to an already dangerous situation.
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: ojstinson on August 25, 2011, 08:38:26 PM
To me the only ugly one is the top of the line super expensive one. I really wouldn't own one but I sure would like to take one for a spin----Especially that 125 mph bad boy.
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: Big Rich on August 25, 2011, 10:48:41 PM
Quote from: bill14224 on August 25, 2011, 06:14:37 PM
SNIP............  I don't think electric bikes will ever become popular because they're too quiet.  Quiet bikes add more danger to an already dangerous situation.

Put a baseball card in the spokes.
Title: Re: Ugly as hell and only $43,000.
Post by: pertt-UP- on August 27, 2011, 11:21:58 AM
Has anyone here ridden a electric motorcycle?

I tested Quantya (http://www.bikepics.com/members/perttup/quantya/) last summer and it was great! I hope I get to ride one on track somday.
I don't care that it doesn't make a loud noise.  Nor does the GS, car drivers can't hear you over the radio and you hardly hear it over the wind noise.

If I would have the money, I would buy or build an electric motorcycle and keep "enginecycle" for longer jorneys.