News:

The simplest way to help GStwin is to use this Amazon link to shop

Main Menu

racetech vs sonic springs

Started by gregos, June 10, 2008, 02:56:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

gregos

hi
what is the difference between the two springs?
does racetech justify + 30% price?


thanx
greg

dgyver

Basically the same product. Paying more for a more commonly known name.

I thought that someone had posted recently that their prices were the same.
Common sense in not very common.

bucks1605

Indy superbikes had race tech springs for $79.99 at one point, but they raised the price up to $89 I think. Still the cheapest place I could find them. I've used both sonics and race techs and frankly I can't tell the difference.
SV1000K3 Bought 03/17/09
1996 GS500E Sold 03/03/09

El motociclista

Just bought some Racetechs from Indy Superbikes for $89.99 before shipping ($102 and some change after). Sonic's are $79.99 before shipping from their website. It may not have been necessary to go with Racetechs but this thread http://gstwins.com/gsboard/index.php?topic=35036.msg390457#msg390457 made me feel okay spending $10 more for Race-techs. Also I had read elsewhere, and you can check this with pictures of both the Sonics and the Race-techs, that R.t. springs are spaced greater apart and also lighter. Someone mentioned that the greater spacing between coils would lead to lesser chance of the springs touching and binding with one another under heavy compression. I would think that the chances of that happening are slim to none though. But, like I said, I thought what the hey, $10 in the long run won't be all that significant.
2001 mods: Racetech springs, Katana rear-shock, K and N drop-in air filter, superbike handlebars, MC Enterprises case guards, CBR900rr passenger pegs up front, uber-fenderectomy, mufflerectomy

bucks1605

Quote from: El motociclista on June 10, 2008, 04:59:48 PM
Just bought some Racetechs from Indy Superbikes for $89.99 before shipping ($102 and some change after). Sonic's are $79.99 before shipping from their website. It may not have been necessary to go with Racetechs but this thread http://gstwins.com/gsboard/index.php?topic=35036.msg390457#msg390457 made me feel okay spending $10 more for Race-techs. Also I had read elsewhere, and you can check this with pictures of both the Sonics and the Race-techs, that R.t. springs are spaced greater apart and also lighter. Someone mentioned that the greater spacing between coils would lead to lesser chance of the springs touching and binding with one another under heavy compression. I would think that the chances of that happening are slim to none though. But, like I said, I thought what the hey, $10 in the long run won't be all that significant.


Cool, a thread I started was actually useful. :laugh:
SV1000K3 Bought 03/17/09
1996 GS500E Sold 03/03/09

The Antibody

No one speaks od progressives much anymore. Years ago they were THE mod. Are they inferior now or just less popular?

  -Anti  8)
Once the President of Coolness, always the President of Coolness.

"Just try not to screw it up!"

dgyver

Quote from: The Antibody on June 10, 2008, 06:09:43 PM
No one speaks od progressives much anymore. Years ago they were THE mod. Are they inferior now or just less popular?

  -Anti  8)

They have always been inferior to straight rate springs for a properly setup suspension.
Common sense in not very common.

The Buddha

Progressives are good for the street, but awful for precise suspension tuning.
Straight rate springs are fine for the street, but on the track its so much better.
Cool.
Buddha.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I run a business based on other people's junk.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk