GStwin.com GS500 Message Forum

Main Area => General GS500 Discussion => Topic started by: gregos on June 10, 2008, 02:56:19 AM

Title: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: gregos on June 10, 2008, 02:56:19 AM
hi
what is the difference between the two springs?
does racetech justify + 30% price?


thanx
greg
Title: Re: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: dgyver on June 10, 2008, 05:39:32 AM
Basically the same product. Paying more for a more commonly known name.

I thought that someone had posted recently that their prices were the same.
Title: Re: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: bucks1605 on June 10, 2008, 05:59:23 AM
Indy superbikes had race tech springs for $79.99 at one point, but they raised the price up to $89 I think. Still the cheapest place I could find them. I've used both sonics and race techs and frankly I can't tell the difference.
Title: Re: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: El motociclista on June 10, 2008, 04:59:48 PM
Just bought some Racetechs from Indy Superbikes for $89.99 before shipping ($102 and some change after). Sonic's are $79.99 before shipping from their website. It may not have been necessary to go with Racetechs but this thread http://gstwins.com/gsboard/index.php?topic=35036.msg390457#msg390457 (http://gstwins.com/gsboard/index.php?topic=35036.msg390457#msg390457) made me feel okay spending $10 more for Race-techs. Also I had read elsewhere, and you can check this with pictures of both the Sonics and the Race-techs, that R.t. springs are spaced greater apart and also lighter. Someone mentioned that the greater spacing between coils would lead to lesser chance of the springs touching and binding with one another under heavy compression. I would think that the chances of that happening are slim to none though. But, like I said, I thought what the hey, $10 in the long run won't be all that significant.
Title: Re: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: bucks1605 on June 10, 2008, 05:43:26 PM
Quote from: El motociclista on June 10, 2008, 04:59:48 PM
Just bought some Racetechs from Indy Superbikes for $89.99 before shipping ($102 and some change after). Sonic's are $79.99 before shipping from their website. It may not have been necessary to go with Racetechs but this thread http://gstwins.com/gsboard/index.php?topic=35036.msg390457#msg390457 (http://gstwins.com/gsboard/index.php?topic=35036.msg390457#msg390457) made me feel okay spending $10 more for Race-techs. Also I had read elsewhere, and you can check this with pictures of both the Sonics and the Race-techs, that R.t. springs are spaced greater apart and also lighter. Someone mentioned that the greater spacing between coils would lead to lesser chance of the springs touching and binding with one another under heavy compression. I would think that the chances of that happening are slim to none though. But, like I said, I thought what the hey, $10 in the long run won't be all that significant.


Cool, a thread I started was actually useful. :laugh:
Title: Re: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: The Antibody on June 10, 2008, 06:09:43 PM
No one speaks od progressives much anymore. Years ago they were THE mod. Are they inferior now or just less popular?

  -Anti  8)
Title: Re: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: dgyver on June 10, 2008, 09:00:08 PM
Quote from: The Antibody on June 10, 2008, 06:09:43 PM
No one speaks od progressives much anymore. Years ago they were THE mod. Are they inferior now or just less popular?

  -Anti  8)

They have always been inferior to straight rate springs for a properly setup suspension.
Title: Re: racetech vs sonic springs
Post by: The Buddha on June 10, 2008, 09:09:09 PM
Progressives are good for the street, but awful for precise suspension tuning.
Straight rate springs are fine for the street, but on the track its so much better.
Cool.
Buddha.