OK since Joerocker has the week off and the previous pot stirrer has colled down ... or gotten to the tard farm ... not sure ...
What would you give up ... food or sex ... considering if you give up food you'd die in 2-3 weeks ... If you give up food .. you'd be fed via IV or eat a tablet ... and sex is only with your current partner ... you're not changing anything else about your life ... just giving up one of the 2 ... no swapping your SO for Catherine Zeta Jones ... Not unless you are Micheal douglas ...  :lol:
Cool.
Srinath.
Flame away ... I'd give up food ... no contest ...

oh that's easy, sex.   gives me more time to ride.

Wait...I'm still flippin' a coin. Love the little 500 and this forum.

C.......

so if i choose food...i'd die in 2-3 weeks?...well....that really sucks...

what about sex with food?

If you give up food you'll be dead in 2-3 weeks?  If you give up sex you might as well be dead.  Where's the difference?  :lol:
Also, if you are married, you've already given up sex,    so why give up food as well?
Besides, it's not like these are the only two pleasures.  You can still ride your GS, at least for 2-3 weeks.  :lol:

Financially, this is a no brainer. Food costs way more than sex in the long run. That extra cash mean mods for the GS.

Quote from: Frostso if i choose food...i'd die in 2-3 weeks?...well....that really sucks...

What ... If you give up food ... you'd be fed intravenously and via pellets ... choose to give up sex and you can eat anything anywhere ... Its a hypothetical question ... in either case we'd make sure you'd not die from Over dose or under dose of anything ...
Cool.
Srinath.

ok i have gone without sex before for some long stretches of time.  :x  i survived so i'd have to say sex cause i love to eat. wait sex uis great too, damn can i get back to you in a minute.

ok after long consideration and a slap to the back of the head, i say food.  :lol:

Well if were were given a food tablet/pill the hunger would be satiated.   But if we chose sex then that should mean no orgasms whatsoever with yourself or others and the urge would never be satiated slowly driving us insane.  So the two really aren't equal... unless the choices are being fed by pills or completely destroying your sex drive all together.  Or another option could be to eat the food pills but still feel hungry.

Quote from: cozyFinancially, this is a no brainer. Food costs way more than sex in the long run. That extra cash mean mods for the GS.

You must be single.  Sex ends up costing me 10x more than food cost me when I was single.    :lol:

yeah, sex has a very high price myfriend, and when your married you pay more for less. Heh, sometimes you pay for nothing and you have to smile about it.

If you're only allowed to have sex with just one partner the rest of your life, I'll give up the sex and keep the food. If that limitation wasn't there, I'd give up food and take the sex.

well, i'm concerned with a Soylent Green scenario developing in my lifetime when i think about this.

GOOD movie.  and its wayyyy old for me .  my parents were hippies .  

QuoteWell if were were given a food tablet/pill the hunger would be satiated. But if we chose sex then that should mean no orgasms whatsoever with yourself or others and the urge would never be satiated slowly driving us insane. So the two really aren't equal... unless the choices are being fed by pills or completely destroying your sex drive all together. Or another option could be to eat the food pills but still feel hungry.

huger would be satisfied.  but imagine never being able to taste your favorite meal.  not only do i eat to satisfy my hunger, but moreso to satisfy my taste.   and also u said no orgasms, and the never satisfied urge.. ever hear of self pleasure?  someone had to say it.  ya ya its not the same but it'll pull u through  :dunno:

Quote from: weaselnoze


huger would be satisfied.  but imagine never being able to taste your favorite meal.  not only do i eat to satisfy my hunger, but moreso to satisfy my taste.   and also u said no orgasms, and the never satisfied urge.. ever hear of self pleasure?  someone had to say it.  ya ya its not the same but it'll pull u through  :dunno:

"Self pleasure" is sex IMHO.  While it may not be intercourse or fellatio or whatever, it still satisfies the sexual urge...  

And I will argue that if your hunger is satisfied you will not have the desire to satisfy your taste.  Imagine yourself on Thanksgiving evening after you have stuffed yourself like a monkey in a squeeze cage and just the idea of eating anything more can be nauseating.  That is having your hunger satisfied.  

I think the only thing that could be comparable in this scenario is if you were fed the bare minimum to maintain survival, but that might have a negative effect on your libido.  

I think tonight I'll eat my favorite meal in my favorite restaurant,  shoot some pool in my favorite bar, have a couple rounds of my favorite beer, bang out my favorite girlfriend, take a shot of Wild Turkey for a nightcap and go to bed completly satisfied...ain't life grand?   :mrgreen:

people dont always eat to satisfy hunger.  thats why america is fat.  cause they eat as recreation.

so if you gave up food, you'd go out with a bang? :nana:

Can't go along with Cosy's arrestion that food costs more than sex, some things you pay for without knowing it. Putting that aside I have given this considerable thought overnight and come to the conclusion that I wasted my time even considering it. Feasting, fighting and fornicating (Polite huh?) are three things that make life worth living.  

Plus biking of course but the alliteration failed to measure up.