http://www.nonobject.com/nUCLEUS/

You don't, instead you set it on fire.  That's the most hideous piece of shaZam! I've ever laid eyes on...............and I've actually had the displeasure of meeting Hillary face to face.

Quote from: spcterry on May 09, 2008, 12:33:59 PM
You don't, instead you set it on fire.  That's the most hideous piece of shaZam! I've ever laid eyes on...............and I've actually had the displeasure of meeting Hillary face to face.

wtf is that?


as well did you offer her a cigar?

ugly... but interesting!

Doesn't leave much in terms of modifications...maybe some stickers

What a pile of shaZam!. Did you read the writing about it?

This is a classic example of some knob head who thought..... the world loves modern/contempory (agreed - an ipod world) the world loves designs that are different to all others (agreed - thinks outside the box) what they didn't think of was who the f%$k wants IKEA flat pack around a motorcycle. You CANT reinevent a motorcycle (a fast, agile, thrillseeking vehicle) and make it nothing like a f%$king motorcycle. If your going to upgrade something and make it contempory it at least has to be able to do what it did before.


I get really pissed off with this kinda shaZam! - people looking for the world to praise them for something so radical and innovative when actually its a pile of shaZam! its as if not less useful than a chocolate fireguard.

A perfect example for comparison - the 'artist' who took a teens dirty bedroom, photographed it, then reconstructed the same scene in the Tate Modern in London and instantly its a work of art. No its f%$king not it was someones bedroom now its someones bedroom on a window display. Does that mean anything - i think not. All you have done is pissed someone off for taking their bedroom away.  - They took contempory art just too far same as above. Retards get a real job.

Its obviously not a real bike. No controls other than hand levers. Not even an exhaust pipe or turn signal light. Just a ploy to get you to think outside the "box", so to speak, regardless of how fugly, non-functional, and awkward to ride it is. If they were really going for non-conventional though, they woulda put hubless wheels on it.

Quote from: Kasumi on May 09, 2008, 04:13:16 PM
What a pile of shaZam!. Did you read the writing about it?

This is a classic example of some knob head who thought..... the world loves modern/contempory (agreed - an ipod world) the world loves designs that are different to all others (agreed - thinks outside the box) what they didn't think of was who the f%$k wants IKEA flat pack around a motorcycle. You CANT reinevent a motorcycle (a fast, agile, thrillseeking vehicle) and make it nothing like a f%$king motorcycle. If your going to upgrade something and make it contempory it at least has to be able to do what it did before.


I get really pissed off with this kinda shaZam! - people looking for the world to praise them for something so radical and innovative when actually its a pile of shaZam! its as if not less useful than a chocolate fireguard.

A perfect example for comparison - the 'artist' who took a teens dirty bedroom, photographed it, then reconstructed the same scene in the Tate Modern in London and instantly its a work of art. No its f%$king not it was someones bedroom now its someones bedroom on a window display. Does that mean anything - i think not. All you have done is pissed someone off for taking their bedroom away.  - They took contempory art just too far same as above. Retards get a real job.

I figured someone was going to flame this thing. Don't blame you at all.

Here's my take:

It's 'new' and 'edgy' and whatever else the marketing idiots are buzzing about now. Maybe 'refined' and 'innovative' are buzz words being recycled now too. I dunno. Without reading much;

it has air suspension, that can actually allow the frame (?) to fall flat on the ground. Recipe for disaster ?

it can't lean, or at least not far ?

it's going to be allot of fun on the windy days. NOT !

I'd appreciate the marketing and artsy folks staying far the f%$k away from the REAL ENGINEERS so we can continue to enjoy engine innovations, tires that last amazingly long, and reliability, instead of fru fru bullshit.

Thanks, that is all.

Quote from: spcterry on May 09, 2008, 12:33:59 PM
You don't, instead you set it on fire.  That's the most hideous piece of shaZam! I've ever laid eyes on...............and I've actually had the displeasure of meeting Hillary face to face.

meh thats giving hillary credit or a compliment. this thing looks as though it would be as stable as a drunkard in a hurricane

Guys, it's a NON object, it appears that it's a mostly mental construct. I bookmarked it and it comes up as "NON Object Design Fiction".

You couldn't really ride it, nobody could sit on it for more than 10 minutes, it looks like it's just a design exercise.

Now DON'T get me started on the Tate Modern, what a buncha psychos with their heads so far up their asses they fart out their noses! Honestly most of the crap they call art makes me vomit in my mouth. It's an insult to mankind, ethics, morals, and real artists. the guys who did the bike are more artists than ANYONE who ever showed any "modern art" at the Tate. But that of course is just my opinion.